November 10, 2011<\/span><\/p>\n A review of the strategy behind al-Shabaab\u2019s August withdrawal from Mogadishu that recently appeared on jihadi websites has compared the pull-out with Russia\u2019s scorched-earth withdrawal into the Russian interior during Napoleon\u2019s invasion and the Taliban withdrawal into the mountains from Kabul in 2001 (ansar1.info, October 25). <\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n Ugandan AMISOM Soldier on Patrol in Mogadishu<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n In an article called \u201cMogadishu\u2026 the New Kabul!\u201d author Abu Abdul Malik notes that prior to the withdrawal, al-Shabaab had seized 95% of Mogadishu, but the main facilities of the city, including its port, airport and presidential palace remained under the control of the Somali Transitional Federal Government (TFG) and the Ugandan and Burundian troops of the African Union Mission in Somalia (AMISOM). <\/span><\/p>\n High security and inaccessibility prevented al-Shabaab from taking control of the military bases of TFG and African Union troops. In this situation, \u201ca nucleus of the enemy remained which would enable them to grow through the importation of new weapons and more soldiers and training Somali hirelings from abroad.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n Al-Shabaab\u2019s failure to eliminate these bases led to the further intervention of \u201cforeign advisors from France and America, as well as mercenary Blackwater forces.\u201d The Somali militants concluded that \u201cprolonging this course of action did not serve the interests of al-Shabaab in any way\u2026\u201d <\/span><\/p>\n Following the failure of al-Shabaab\u2019s Ramadan offensive in Mogadishu, the perceived solution was to abandon the long urban warfare campaign and turn to guerrilla warfare in areas controlled by AMISOM by forgoing the occupation of the city. This move allowed al-Shabaab to once more resume the offensive initiative by allowing it to determine when and where it wished to engage the enemy and in what numbers. While AMISOM forces were concentrated in a square kilometer of Mogadishu they were almost unassailable; however, forcing the undermanned African Union mission to attempt to occupy the whole of Mogadishu drew the normally reticent AU troops from their bases and spread them out across a city rife with opportunities for ambush. The result has been at least one highly successful attack on patrolling AMISOM forces (see Terrorism Monitor, November 3). According to Abu Abdul Malik: \u201cMogadishu has become what Moscow became to Napoleon. Just let the enemy come out, he will fall in the great Mogadishu trap! \u2026 Let them become intoxicated as Napoleon was intoxicated by Moscow and as the Russians and Americans were by Kabul\u2026\u201d <\/span><\/p>\n This article first appeared in the November 10, 2011 issue of the Jamestown Foundation\u2019s Terrorism Monitor.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Andrew McGregor November 10, 2011 A review of the strategy behind al-Shabaab\u2019s August withdrawal from Mogadishu that recently appeared on jihadi websites has compared the pull-out with Russia\u2019s scorched-earth withdrawal into the Russian interior during Napoleon\u2019s invasion and the Taliban … Continue reading <\/p>\n