Outlook for Minority Rebel and Separatist Militants in Iran

Andrew McGregor

Terrorism Monitor 24(7)

Jamestown Foundation, Washington DC

April 17, 2026

Executive Summary:

  • Iran’s marginalized ethnic minorities, who often endure state suppression, may view current U.S. and Israeli military operations as an opportunity to seize greater autonomy.
  • Four minority groups—the Kurds, Balochs, Lurs, and Ahwazi Arabs—maintain armed factions. Additionally, the exiled Mujahedin-e-Khalq (MEK) aggressively pursues violent regime change, losing 100 fighters in a clash with the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) on February 25.
  • Armed factions are most likely to hesitate before any action due to unclear American objectives, fears of brutal regime retaliation if abandoned, and the fact that ethnic Persian opposition figures often share the regime’s hostile view of these minority groups as separatist threats.

Iranian officials frequently refer to Iran and its 93 million people as “ethnically homogenous.”  They often proclaim the unity of the Islamic Republic and obscure the existence of the country’s numerous minority groups. Many of these groups have had a contentious relationship with the Iranian state since Reza Pahlavi’s 1921 coup introduced the ideological supremacy of Persian and Twelver Shi’a identity.

Iranian leaders typically regard minority demands for greater autonomy as threats to state security. Many minority members are denied government identification, leaving them open to various abuses by administrators and security forces. Accusations of working for Israel’s Mossad or the CIA are usually enough to justify internal repression by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and the regime’s Basij militia. The sheer number of detainees imprisoned for alleged “collaboration” with Israel suggests the political convenience of the charges.

The current U.S. and Israeli military operations against Iran may be viewed by some minority leaders as an opportunity to seize greater autonomy. The perils of challenging a regime facing an external existential threat, however, are both clear and significant.

Iran’s Ethnic and Religious Composition

The closest Iran gets to homogeneity is in its religious makeup. Shi’ite Muslims constitute some 90 percent of Iran’s population. Sunni Muslims represent 9 percent, while the remainder consists of Christians, Baha’i, Jews, Zoroastrians, and Sabean Mandaeans (Gnostic monotheists).

Persians make up 61 percent of the Iranian population. There is wide variation regarding the numbers and percentages of minority groups represented in the population, which are perhaps best outlined in general terms:

  • Larger minority groups (10-17 percent of the population): Kurds and Azeri Turks,
  • Mid-sized minority groups (5-9 percent): Lurs,
  • Small minority groups (2-4 percent): Ahwazi Arabs, Balochs, Turkmen,
  • Very small minority groups (1 percent or less): Georgians, Qashqai, Armenians, Circassians, Assyrians (Al Jazeera, June 20, 2025).

Of the minority groups, four are known to have armed factions—the Kurds, the Balochs, the Ahwazi Arabs, and the Lurs. While most of those arrested during the 2025 protests were Persian, large numbers of Balochs, Kurds, and Ahwazi Arabs were also detained (Iran International, July 23, 2025).

Minorities of Iran (CRS)

Many of Iran’s ethnic minorities hoped to benefit from the overthrow of the Shah following the 1979 Islamic Revolution. The new Islamic regime quickly suppressed their aspirations, except in Iranian Kurdistan, however, which continued to resist Persian rule. Marginalization—if not outright persecution—continued to be the shared experience of Iran’s minorities after the Islamic Revolution. Surveillance and detention of minorities intensified after last June’s Israeli and American bombing campaign.

The Azeris

Azeri Turks (Amargi)

The Shi’ite Azeris are well-integrated into the Persian power structure; the late Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s father was an Azeri Turk. The Azeri Turks dominated the Iranian state from 1501 to 1925, including both the Safavid dynasty—which established Twelver Shi’ism as the state religion—and the later Qajar dynasty. When the latter was brought down by the Pahlavis, Azeri influence was diminished, and the Azeri language repressed. Recently, Israeli media have encouraged “the South Azerbaijani nation [i.e., Iranian Azerbaijan] and other ethnic groups” in Iran to “wage a war of revolution” (Jerusalem Post, March 4).

Percentage of Azeri Turks in Provinces of Iran (r/MapPorn)

The Ahwazi Arabs

Most of Iran’s Ahwazi Arab population lives in the southwestern province of Khuzestan. This province is home to Iran’s largest oil field, which accounts for 90 percent of Iranian oil production, as well as large shares of Iran’s natural gas and water resources. A mix of Arabized locals and migrant tribes from Iraq, the Ahwazi Arabs are mostly Shi’a, with a small number of Sunnis. The community’s main language is Farsi, and Arabic-language education is forbidden except for religious instruction.

(Arab News)

Before an emerging oil industry brought in an influx of ethnic Persian workers, Khuzestan was known as Arabistan. The Persians are still favored for employment in the oil sector over the Arab population. Khuzestan’s natural resources and its strategic location on the Persian Gulf have led to a low tolerance for Arab cultural and political aspirations (New Lines Institute, February 18).

Existing as an autonomous emirate (Muhammara) since 1812, the region was fully incorporated into Iran in 1925, with its Arab ruler and his son placed in detention in Tehran. Place names were Persianized, and efforts at assimilation were first launched by Reza Shah (1925-1941) and continued under the Islamic Republic. Protests against the repression of Arab culture or expressions of Arab identity are typically met with violence (Arab News, January 7, 2022). Some residents seek independence or autonomy in a federal state.

Ahwazi Protest (Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs)

The Harakat al-Nidal al-‘Arabi li-Tahrir al-‘Ahwaz (Arab Struggle Movement for the Liberation of Ahwaz, ASMLA) is an armed group advocating the creation of an Arab state comprising Khuzestan and parts of several neighboring Iranian provinces. With rival leaderships based in Denmark and the Netherlands, the movement has carried out bombings and assassinations, leading to its designation as a terrorist group by the Iranian government.

As protests grew in Iran earlier this year, five Ahwazi political fronts agreed on February 9 to come under the authority of a single Coordinating Council of Ahwazi Organizations. The stated goals of the new umbrella group include preventing political violence, respecting human rights, and cooperating with other Iranian minorities (Middle East Online, February 24).

The Baloch

The Sunni Muslim Baloch people are spread across a region split between Iran, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. In Iran, the Baloch are concentrated in the Sistan-Baluchestan province, bordering Pakistan’s restless Balochistan province, which hosts a number of Baloch insurgent movements (there are differences between Pakistan and Iran in the official spelling of Balochistan/Baluchestan).

Sistan-Baluchestan has abundant resources, including oil, gas, coal, copper, uranium, and rare earth elements. Despite this, the Sunni Baloch of Iran have much lower living standards than their Shi’a Persian countrymen and suffer from state repression of their language, culture, and political aspirations (New Lines Institute, February 18). They are also ineligible to hold most elected positions in Iran.

Jaysh al-Adl (Army of Justice), a Balochi anti-Shi’a Islamist militant group, emerged around 2012 as a successor to the earlier Jundullah movement, after Tehran’s capture and execution of Jundullah leader Abdelmalek Rigi in 2010 (see Terrorism Monitor, February 4, 2010). Jaysh al-Adl is designated as a terrorist organization by both Iran and the United States.

Balochi Insurgents in Iran (Rudaw)

Fighters of Jaysh al-Adl often take refuge across the border in Pakistani Balochistan during the Iranian military operations that follow the group’s attacks. Pakistan, on the other hand, accuses Iran of providing refuge to the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA) and Balochistan Liberation Front (BLF) (see Terrorism Monitor, January 31, 2024). Cross-border strikes on Balochi insurgents have become common in recent years as Jaysh al-Adl and other armed Balochi groups carry out kidnappings, assassinations, suicide bombings, and attacks on police stations (Al Jazeera, January 17, 2024; Dawn, January 19, 2024).

In December 2025, Jaysh al-Adl announced it had merged with several other Baloch separatist movements to form the “Popular Fighters’ Front.” The new group intends to focus on civil disobedience “with full observance of personal and public security principles” while continuing attacks on Iranian security forces (Iran International, December 12, 2025).

Kurds

The Kurds are the second largest but most politically and militarily organized of Iran’s minority groups. Mostly Sunni rather than Shi’ite, Iran’s Kurds have experienced repression of their language, culture, and education.

Percentage of Kurds in Provinces of Iran (r/Map Porn)

The existence of significant and often restless Kurdish communities in Syria, Iraq, and Türkiye, as well as Iran, has opened the group up to allegations of separatist tendencies and foreign influence. Iran’s four impoverished Kurdish-majority provinces notably lie along the Iraqi border, further contributing to the perception of separatist leanings. The Turkish government—now in the process of reconciling with its own Kurdish separatist movements—has no desire to see any kind of Kurdish political or military success in the region that might disrupt ongoing reconciliation processes in south-eastern Türkiye.

Iranian-Kurdish movements are insisting on an American-enforced no-fly zone over their operational area in northern Iran as well as the presence of U.S. land-based forces, before launching an offensive against the Iranian regime. This hesitancy stems from having witnessed fellow Kurds being burned several times in the past through alliances with the United States (France24, March 5). Reports indicate that the CIA began discussions on arming Iraq-based Iranian Kurdish opposition groups in early March and may have already begun supplying small arms (Al-Jazeera, March 4; El Pais, March 19). Since then, Iran has targeted the bases of these groups inside Iraq (France24, March 5).

Armed Kurds (Monocle)

The Alliance of Political Forces of Iranian Kurdistan (a coalition of six Kurdish political movements) stated that “the struggle for the overthrow of the Islamic Republic and the realization of the national rights of the Kurdish nation” would continue unabated following Iranian attacks on Erbil, Sulaymaniyah and other places in Iraqi Kurdistan where Iranian Kurdish dissidents are based (PDKI.org; Anadolu Ajansi, March 8). Though there have been some intimations of a possible Kurdish offensive in western Iran, Iraq’s prime minister, Muhammad Shi’a al-Sudani, and Kurdistan regional president Nechirvan Barzani, have united in declaring that “Iraqi territory must not be used as a launching point for attacks against neighboring countries” (Al-Jazeera, March 7).

The United States has sent mixed signals regarding the desirability of a Kurdish entry into the campaign in Iran. On March 5, U.S. President Donald Trump considered the possibility of a Kurdish attack, stating, “I think it’s wonderful that they want to do that, I’d be all for it” (Al-Jazeera, March 6). Two days later, however, the president remarked: “We’re very friendly with the Kurds, as you know, but we don’t want to make the war any more complex than it already is … I don’t want the Kurds going in. I don’t want to see the Kurds get hurt, get killed” (Anadolu Ajansi, March 8). The IRGC warned at the same time that “If separatist groups in the region [of Kurdistan] make any move against Iran’s territorial integrity, we will crush them” (Al-Arabiya, March 7).

During the nationwide protests in Iran earlier this year, Kurdish opposition parties agreed to carry out strikes rather than protests in order to avoid the massacres that followed similar protests in the past. Nonetheless, raids by security forces followed the strikes, even in Kurdish Shi’ite communities.

The Mojahedin-e-Khalq (MEK)

One exiled Iranian insurgent group—though not an ethnic minority—must be included in the list of movements seeking the violent downfall of the Iranian regime. The People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI, better known as Mujahedin-e-Khalq – MEK) is a Marxist-Islamist group initially formed in 1965 to oppose the rule of the Pahlavi monarchy. The MEK is a designated terrorist group within Iran and appeared on the American Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) list from 1997 to 2012.

MEK Emblem

The movement backed the Iranian Revolution in 1978-1979, believing they could leverage their support into a power-sharing agreement. Instead, they found themselves targeted by the new regime, forcing their leadership to flee to Paris while surviving members relocated to Iraq. The movement responded with suicide attacks, bombings, assassinations, and attacks on Iranian embassies abroad (Al-Jazeera, August 4, 2011).

MEK operated from bases in Iraq after being banned by Iran’s post-revolution Islamic regime, carrying out credibility-damaging attacks on Iran during the Iraq–Iran War (1980-88) (Israel Hayom, January 13). In exchange for MEK support in suppressing Kurdish and Shi’ite rebellions in Iraq, Saddam Hussein provided the movement with military training, armor, and artillery (Times of Israel, March 5). The UN and the United States asked Albania to relocate the movement from Iraq in 2013 after it came under pressure from Shi’ite and Kurdish groups seeking revenge for their collaboration with Saddam Hussein. Some 3,000 members of MEK have since been based in an Albanian village (Deutsche Welle, January 20).

By June 2023, however, the MEK had worn out its welcome in Albania. 1,000 Albanian security officers raided the MEK compound during an organized crime investigation related to terrorist financing on June 20, 2023. Fifteen police officers and 21 MEK members were injured when MEK members attempted to prevent the seizure of computers and laptops (EuroNews, June 21, 2023; Times of Israel, March 5).

   Massoud and Maryam Rajavi – MEK Camp (BBC)

The MEK now presents itself as a human-rights-focused “democratic alternative” to the clerical regime in Iran. Former U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has visited the group’s camp in Albania and described MEK leader Maryam Rajavi as “laying the groundwork for a free, sovereign, and democratic republic in Iran” (Iran International, May 17, 2022). The movement’s official leader, Massoud Rajavi, has not been seen since March 2003, and the MEK has gained a reputation as a cult-like group exercising strict control over its members. Dissident members are typically described as agents of Iranian intelligence and subject to retaliation.

MEK Supporters (MEK Iran)

The IRGC reported killing at least 100 MEK fighters during a MEK operation near the Tehran headquarters of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, just days before the launch of the Israeli-American bombing campaign began (the incident and losses were confirmed by the MEK) (Jerusalem Post, February 25).

Despite broad American political support, the MEK’s legitimacy as an Iranian opposition group suffers from its historical collaboration with Iraq, its long period of exile, and its socialist ideology.

Conclusion

Iranian minorities are likely to be alarmed by any upsurge in Persian support for the return of a Pahlavi monarchy known for Persian supremacism. Would-be king of Iran, Reza Pahlavi—son of the late Shah Mohamed Reza Pahlavi—recently described the Kurds and other minorities as “contemptible” separatists, stating, “Iran’s territorial integrity is the ultimate red line of our great and united nation. Any individual or group that crosses this red line, or collaborates with those who do, will face the resolute response of the Iranian nation” (X/@PahlaviReza).

Reza Shah Pahlavi (Ashraf Pahlavi)

Ethnic Persian opposition groups have little in common with the ethnic minority factions, often sharing the regime’s view of these groups as separatist threats to Iranian sovereignty. The MEK leadership has, in the past, even encouraged its members to kill Kurdish fighters before taking on the IRGC (Al-Jazeera, August 4, 2011).

The lack of clear goals or timelines for the U.S.–Israeli military campaign has discouraged the entry of armed Iranian ethnic minority factions into the conflict. If Washington declares it has achieved its objectives and withdraws its forces, these groups are likely to find themselves facing the fury of a wounded regime ready to see treasonous cooperation with Israelis and Americans behind any signs of opposition.

Baloch Nationalist Leader Discusses Creation of a Secular and Independent Balochistan

Andrew McGregor

December 3, 2009

Baloch leader Hyrbyair Marri recently gave an interview on the independence movement and growing insurgency in the highly strategic and resource rich Pakistani province of Balochistan (Geo News [Karachi], November 26). Hyrbyair seeks a negotiated withdrawal of the Pakistani military from Balochistan, maintaining that Balochistan was an independent country in 1947 until Pakistani forces occupied the region in 1948. Provincial autonomy is rejected as “we do not accept that Balochistan is a province of Pakistan.”

HyrbyairHyrbyair Marri

Hyrbyair is the son of Marri tribal chief Nawab Khair Bakhsh Marri. His brother, Balach Marri, a reported leader of the Marxist-oriented and Marri-dominated Baloch Liberation Army (BLA), was killed by Pakistani security forces in 2007 (Balochistan Express, November 22, 2007). Hyrbyair is a former Balochistan MP (1997-2002) and was a minister in the provincial assembly for two of those years. He fled to the UK in 2002, but was arrested and charged with inciting terrorism in December 2007 (Dawn [Karachi], December 12). Supporters of Hyrbyair claim the arrest came at the request of former Pakistan president General Pervez Musharaff, who demanded action on Balochi nationalists living in exile in the UK as the price of further cooperation in the war on terrorism. An Islamabad daily reported that the new government contributed substantial amounts to Hyrbyair’s defense as part of a program of confidence-building measures with Baloch leaders. Hyrbyair was acquitted on three charges with no decision on a fourth in February 2009 (Crown Prosecution Service Press Statement, March 10).

Compared to the rest of Pakistan, Balochistan is sparsely populated and poorly developed, but Hyrbyair insists that an abundance of natural resources such as oil and gas will provide the economic backbone for an independent state. Hyrbyair suggests a secular Baloch state may also attract the support of the United States. “Secularism is in the nature of the Baloch people and is a part of the Baloch ethos.”

Hyrbyair rejected the past participation of Baloch politicians in Pakistan’s federal government, describing two former Baloch presidents and one prime minister as “paid employees of the federal government.” Baloch politicians who took government posts may have “wanted to do something for the people of Balochistan, but contrary to that, their participation in the political process consolidated the tyranny of the federal government over Balochistan.”

In response to questions regarding the violence of the independence movement and the targeting of Punjabi civilians, Hyrbyair denies having any influence over the movement, which he claims is run by “local Baloch youth,” though he also claims to have no idea who the movement’s leader is. Asked if the independence movement was financed by India, Hyrbyair replied, “I don’t think that it is true.”

The development of the massive new Gwadar port in Balochistan is a major point of contention, with Hyrbyair claiming the port will benefit only Pakistan and not Balochistan. The nationalist leader says local leaders who opposed the development were kidnapped and killed by Pakistani intelligence agencies. Hyrbyair denies that the opposition to the port is being funded by Gulf states that will lose business to the modern facilities being built at Gwadar.

The Urdu language interview came only a day after Hyrbyair and other exiled Baloch leaders rejected a proposal from Islamabad designed to end the long-standing insurgency in Balochistan. The offer called for a cessation in military activities, the release of political detainees and a payment of $1.4 billion in gas royalties over 12 years (Reuters, November 25). The “Rahe-i-Haqooq Balochistan” package included a ban on the construction of new military camps in Balochistan, though two existing camps would remain operational. Hyrbyair described the government’s proposal as “a mockery and a cruel joke” (The News [Islambad]. November 25).

This article first appeared in the December 3, 2009 issue of the Jamestown Foundation’s Terrorism Monitor

Balochistan Rebel Leader Seeks Outside Military Support

Andrew McGregor

July 29, 2008

While global attention remains focused on Taliban activities in Pakistan’s northwest frontier, heavy fighting has broken out in southwest Pakistan’s Balochistan province, where well-armed nationalist insurgents are battling detachments of the locally-raised Frontier Corps. While sparsely populated, Pakistan’s biggest province is rich in minerals and energy resources, inspiring a number of rebel movements to fight what they view as uncompensated exploitation of the region by Pakistan’s central government.

NawabNawab Sardar Brahamdagh Khan Bugti (al-Jazeera)

Nawab Sardar Brahamdagh Khan Bugti, current leader of the Baloch Republican Party and grandson of the late Balochi nationalist leader Nawab Akbar Bugti (killed by Pakistani security forces in 2006), has announced that rebel forces under his command are prepared to accept military assistance from any nation willing to provide it, including India, Iran or Afghanistan (BBC, July 22). In an interview from an undisclosed location, Brahamdagh Bugti argued: “Pakistan is a nuclear power, and if it can use the assistance and sophisticated weapons it is getting from the United States against the Baloch people, we have the right to accept external assistance… No country has so far provided assistance to us. However, if any country, including India, Afghanistan, and Iran, offers assistance or cooperation, we will happily accept it.”

In the current fighting centered around Dera Bugti, insurgents belonging to the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) and Baloch Republican Army (BRA) have blasted gas pipelines, brought down power pylons, attacked a gas plant with rockets, destroyed military vehicles with remote-controlled bombs and used explosives to heavily damage the wall of a Frontier Corps fort. Helicopters have been brought in to assist the Frontier Corps, which has been accused by the insurgents of killing civilians in rebel-held areas (Daily Times [Lahore], July 21; Dawn [Karachi], July 20, July 21; Balochwarna.com, July 24). A general strike organized by a number of Baloch nationalist groups was observed throughout much of Balochistan on July 25 in protest of the killings of women and children in government counter-attacks (Balochwarna.com, July 26). Government forces report destroying insurgent bases and seizing large caches of weapons at several hidden depots (Daily Times, July 22).

The fighting follows the release of a number of imprisoned Balochi nationalists and a partial pullback of government forces from selected regions of Balochistan—not including Dera Bugti—by the new government in Islamabad. The Dera Bugti region is home to Pakistan’s largest natural gas fields and large parts of its gas distribution grid (see Terrorism Monitor, April 3). According to Bramadagh Bugti: “The [current] operation is being conducted to plunder the resources and to keep the Baloch nation backward. The rulers are destroying the Baloch nation for this purpose. We are fighting to defend our land and ourselves. There will be resistance if someone comes here to plunder our resources on the pretext of development” (BBC, July 22).

 This article first appeared in the July 29, 2008 issue of the Jamestown Foundation’s Terrorism Focus

Pakistan Launches New Offensive in Balochistan

Andrew McGregor

June 27, 2006

Since the forcible annexation of the Baloch Khanate of Kalat by Pakistan in 1947, the Balochistan region has seen a succession of revolts against political centralization and resource exploitation. Balochistan is Pakistan’s largest province, but is sparsely populated with only six million people. A low-level insurgency in the last two years has seen a mixture of indiscriminate bombings and targeted attacks on the region’s energy and transportation infrastructure. The nationalist militants are divided into several factions, the largest of which is the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA).

Balochistan mapThe region is a strategically important territory with considerable mineral, gas and petroleum wealth. Little of the wealth now produced in Balochistan has found its way back into the province, which remains badly underdeveloped and faces a major financial crisis even as new natural gas discoveries continue. As a result, pipelines and other energy installations have been primary targets of Baloch nationalists. President Pervez Musharraf’s government has recently committed large sums for development projects, but some distrustful Baloch nationalists view these as further efforts at “colonization.”

Although Islamabad’s accusations of foreign assistance to the Baloch insurgents typically omit naming suspect countries, Pakistani security services apparently fear the intervention of agents from their traditional Indian rival, as well as others from certain Gulf states said to be unhappy about the opening of a new port in the Baloch coastal town of Gwadar. Balochistan’s society is remarkably insular, however, and is unlikely to fall under the thrall of what Balochis call “outsiders.”

The Dera Bugti and Kohlu regions are the centers of the insurgency and government counter-terrorism operations. The latest outrage was a June 12 terrorist bombing in the city of Quetta that killed five and wounded 17. Nearly all of the casualties were Balochis. The provincial governor suggested the involvement of “foreign hands” and vowed that he would not compromise with opponents of Pakistan’s “national integrity” (APP, June 12). In response to the attacks, helicopter gunships are again being deployed in the region, painful reminders of the havoc caused by these weapons on the civilian population during the bitterly fought 1973-1977 insurgency. Many of the region’s politicians are calling for their withdrawal.

On June 15, 12 members of the BLA were arrested on charges of terrorism. They are alleged to have carried out a series of bombing and rocket attacks under the direction of Nawab Akbar Khan Bugti, an important chieftain (Daily Times, June 16). Jets and helicopter gunships followed up with attacks on armed tribesmen in the Kohlu region. Gunbattles between insurgents and security forces were also reported in the Dera Bugti region (Dawn, Karachi, June 15). Nawab Bugti claimed that the government attacks killed 17 civilians but no militants (Pajhwok Afghan News, June 14).

Balochi fighterBalochi Fighter (Friday Times)

Government plans to build military bases in Balochistan to secure valuable energy resources are seen as the imposition of a foreign occupation force (Balochis are a rare element in Pakistan’s armed forces). The former commander of Pakistan’s armed forces, General Jehangir Karamat, has warned that a prolonged military presence in Balochistan would be “counter-productive” (Dawn, June 4). The leader of the Pashtun minority political party, Mehmood Khan Achakzai, claims that the presence of the army and Pakistan’s ISI has turned Balochistan into “a prison cell.”

The Karachi regime has hit back on the political front. An arrest warrant has been issued for the leader of the Balochistan National Party, Sardar Akhtar Khan Mengal, who is accused of kidnapping government intelligence agents. The BLA was declared a terrorist organization (under the 1997 Anti-Terrorism Act) on April 10. General Musharraf has denounced all talk of Baloch “rights” or “sovereignty” as “provocations” (PakTribune, May 23).

There are also government fears that Balochistan is being used as a transit point for foreign militants on their way to join al-Qaeda or Taliban forces active in Pakistan’s northwest frontier. Four Turks and one Afghan were arrested on June 22, attempting to cross from Balochistan into the neighboring province of Waziristan, home of a fierce tribal/Islamist insurgency against Pakistani security forces. The five detainees are accused of ties to the Taliban and/or al-Qaeda terrorists (Pajhwok Afghan News, June 23). After their interrogation, another 11 Afghan nationals were arrested for “possible links” to “al-Qaeda sleeper cells” (Daily Times, June 24).

The Baloch nationalist movement still suffers from tribal and personal enmities and has failed to present a united front. Although accusations have been made that al-Qaeda suspects are harbored in Balochistan, the region has never been known for religious extremism, unlike neighboring areas to the north. The Baloch “liberation movement” still retains a nationalist focus. The Musharraf government appears willing to discuss economic and development issues, but is unwilling to tolerate any discussion of separatist aspirations. Despite this, many local politicians are still eager to open a dialogue with the leading militant nationalists, rather than risk another debilitating civil conflict.

 

This article first appeared in the June 27, 2006 issue of the Jamestown Foundation’s Terrorism Focus